Previous Year Questions Analysis
Archived:
Analyze the failure of Muhammad Bin Tughluq's token currency. Learn how the lack of imperial control and forgery led to economic disruption for UPSC.
Exam Year
2006
Evidence Source
Link ↗Consider the following statements: Assertion (A): The scheme of the token currency of Muhammad Tughluq proved unsuccessful. Reason (R): Muhammad Tughluq did not have the proper control over currency issue.
[U.P.P.C.S. (Pre) 2006]
⚡ Generate AI Quick Summary
Correct Option: A
Muhammad Bin Tughluq's token currency failed because he lacked control over coin production. This allowed widespread forgery, which devalued the currency and disrupted trade.
Analysis & Evidence
Concept
A successful fiat or token currency system requires the state to have a monopoly on minting and strict anti-counterfeiting measures to maintain public trust.
Authentic Source Evidence
Muhammad Bin Tughluq introduced copper/brass tokens in 1330. Contemporary historian Barani notes that 'every Hindu's house became a mint', indicating a total failure of state control.
Analytical Breakdown
Historical Logic Quest
"What happened when Tughluq withdrew the token currency?"
The Topper's Edge
"Tughluq's failure was not in the 'idea' (which was modern), but in the 'execution' and inability to manage the supply of money."
Analysing the UPSC previous year question paper is non-negotiable for serious aspirants. Thoroughly solving and analyzing these questions helps you decode the examiner's mindset, identify recurring historical themes, and build the analytical intuition needed to clear the exam. Practise UPSC PYQ here with interactive question sets to learn and sharpen your edge!